ClinConnect ClinConnect Logo
Search / Trial NCT02082353

Patients Treated for Chronic Granulomatous Disease (CGD) Since 1995

Launched by NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES (NIAID) · Mar 6, 2014

Trial Information

Current as of September 07, 2025

Unknown status

Keywords

Granulomatous Disease, Chronic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (Hsct) Bone Marrow Transplant (Bmt) Non Transplant Factors Associated With Best Outcomes Of Transplant In Cgd

ClinConnect Summary

Chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) is an immune deficiency where the neutrophils (a type of white blood cell that kills bacteria and fungi) do no work properly. Some individuals with CGD have neutrophils that do not work at all, whereas others have neutrophils that work partially, but not normally. In the past (over 20 years ago), most individuals with CGD were managed with antibiotics and antifungal medications alone. As the science of blood and marrow transplant (BMT) improved, some with CGD started to receive a BMT. It remained controversial whether individuals with CGD should receive a...

Gender

ALL

Eligibility criteria

  • Inclusion Criteria:
  • Participant Inclusion Criteria (Part 1 - Longitudinal Analysis)
  • CGD Patients Undergoing Transplant 1995 to Present with Birth Year In or After 1988
  • 1. CGD Patients will be Defined by both Defective Neutrophil NADPH Oxidase Function and by Clinical History Consistent with CGD
  • Patients must have both of:
  • A functional assay demonstrating abnormal NADPH oxidase function (see A below); AND Clinical history consistent with CGD (see B below).
  • \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
  • Patients must have both "A" and "B":
  • A. Function: Assays of NADPH Oxidase Function
  • I. Dihydrorhodamine (DHR) Assay:
  • Blood sample was obtained at a time when patient was clinically stable and not critically ill, with control samples performed simultaneously indicating a qualified assay; and
  • Assay unequivocally demonstrates CGD with an stimulation index (SI) SI \< 35 or equivalent. Assay report, including mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) from unstimulated and stimulated samples and gating strategy, must be de-identified and provided. OR
  • II. Nitroblue Tetrazolium Oxidation Test (NBT):
  • o Diagnostic of CGD (reported as reduced granulocyte oxidative response). Report must be de-identified and provided. AND
  • B. Clinical History: One or More of the Following:
  • Severe and/or recurrent infection (liver, perirectal or lung abscess; pneumonia; adenitis; or osteomyelitis) due to, for example, Staphylococcus aureus, Burkholderia sp, Serratia marcescens, non-albicans Candida sp, Aspergillus sp or other mold; or Nocardia sp or other deep tissue infection characteristic of CGD
  • Sterile granulomatous disease in respiratory, gastrointestinal or urogenital tracts; or Crohn's disease-like colitis
  • A family history consistent with either X-linked or autosomal recessive CGD
  • In cases where either functional assay (A) or history (B) is equivocal, one or more of the following may be used to confirm a diagnosis of CGD:
  • C. Absent or significantly reduced in expression or abnormal size of any of the 5 phox components (gp91 phox, p47 phox, p22 phox, p67phox, and p40phox) of NADPH oxidase, by either:
  • Western blot
  • Northern blot OR D. Mutation in a gene encoding one of the 5 phox components (gp91 phox, p47 phox, p22 phox, p67 phox, and p40 phox) of NADPH oxidase that is predictive of a decreased or absent oxidative burst. (Nonsense, frameshift, or previously described missense mutation associated with CGD).
  • Molecular Diagnosis is Desirable In addition, molecular diagnosis (gene sequencing and expression analysis) of CGD is desirable and should be performed when possible.
  • 2. Further Characterization of Oxidase Level, Longitudinal Study, Prospective Cohort Patients who are to undergo transplantation during the study period must be further characterized as oxidase-null or oxidase positive by level of oxidase production by either:
  • DHR assay stimulation Index: where SI ≤ 2.5 will be classified as oxidase-null CGD. Those with SI \> 2.5 will be classified as oxidase positive CGD. A single validated test that is accepted by the PID-CGD Review Panel is adequate, but testing on two occasions for validation is desirable. OR
  • Ferricytochrome C reduction assay of granulocytes with O2 \< 2.3 nmoles /106 cells/h classified as oxidase-null CGD. A single validated test that is accepted by the PID-CGD Review Panel is adequate, but testing on two occasions for validation is desirable.
  • OR
  • o Genetic sequencing reporting a mutation that is unequivocally associated to absent oxidase production. (e.g. null mutations) will be classified as oxidase-null CGD (See discussion in Appendix I for how family history, genotype and CGD mutation information will be applied to assigning patients lacking any quantitative oxidase activity measurements to residual oxidase-null or residual oxidase-positive groups).
  • 3. Longitudinal Study, Retrospective Cohort Patients who have already been transplanted will be included regardless of whether further characterization by oxidase level (or genotype/mutation data) is possible or not.
  • Non-Transplanted CGD Patients with Birth Year In or After 1988 A non-transplant (conventional therapy) group of CGD subjects will be enrolled in the longitudinal study. The non-transplant subjects will be selected from the potentially eligible (retrospective) patient cohort with diagnosis of CGD treated with conventional non-transplant therapy. Participating sites will enter their entire retrospective cohort of CGD patients having birth year in or after 1988 into the registration cohort for this protocol. Baseline for both non-transplant subjects and HCT subjects for the purpose of comparing survival will be the year of birth. However, for non-transplant subjects, many of the detailed analyses such as infection and autoimmune complication rates will be assessed in the year preceding the date of last contact.
  • Participant Inclusion Criteria (Part 2 - Cross-Sectional Analysis) To participate in the Cross-Sectional Analysis, patients must have previously been enrolled into the Longitudinal Analysis of Protocol 6903. All transplanted subjects in the Cross-Sectional Analysis are surviving and shall have at least 3 years of follow-up post-transplant to be included. Non-transplanted CGD subjects will become eligible for consideration for the Cross-Sectional Analysis if they were eligible and enrolled in the retrospective cohort of the Longitudinal Analysis, and if/when they are \> 3 years post-diagnosis of CGD. Provision of written informed consent will be required for inclusion in the Cross-Sectional Analysis.
  • Exclusion Criteria:
  • Participant Exclusion Criteria (Longitudinal and Cross- Sectional Analyses)
  • Presence of other primary immunodeficiency syndromes that do not meet the clinical and laboratory criteria for CGD.
  • Rac2 Deficiency
  • Myeloperoxidase Deficiency (MPO Deficiency)
  • Glutathione deficiency
  • Leukocyte adhesion deficiency syndrome
  • * Non-transplant subjects:
  • The above exclusions pertain.
  • In addition, non-transplant subjects will be excluded if the only assessment of oxidase function available is the nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) test (a non-quantitative test).

About National Institute Of Allergy And Infectious Diseases (Niaid)

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) is a key component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) dedicated to advancing the understanding, prevention, and treatment of infectious and immune-mediated diseases. Through rigorous clinical trials, NIAID aims to foster innovative research that enhances public health and addresses global health challenges, including emerging infectious diseases and allergies. The institute collaborates with various partners, including academic institutions, industry, and international organizations, to translate scientific discoveries into effective therapies and vaccines. NIAID's commitment to high-quality clinical research is integral to improving health outcomes and informing policy decisions in the realm of infectious diseases and immunology.

Locations

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

New York, New York, United States

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Los Angeles, California, United States

Portland, Oregon, United States

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Dallas, Texas, United States

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Houston, Texas, United States

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Palo Alto, California, United States

Wilmington, Delaware, United States

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Rochester, New York, United States

Valhalla, New York, United States

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Seattle, Washington, United States

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Los Angeles, California, United States

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

San Francisco, California, United States

Washington, District Of Columbia, United States

Saint Petersburg, Florida, United States

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Saint Louis, Missouri, United States

Saint Louis, Missouri, United States

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Patients applied

0 patients applied

Trial Officials

Jennifer M. Puck, MD

Principal Investigator

University of California, San Francisco

Donald B. Kohn, MD

Principal Investigator

University of California, Los Angeles

Timeline

First submit

Trial launched

Trial updated

Estimated completion

Not reported

Similar Trials