Plasma-Lyte 148® versUs Saline Study
Launched by THE GEORGE INSTITUTE · Mar 22, 2016
Trial Information
Current as of April 25, 2025
Completed
Keywords
ClinConnect Summary
Fluid resuscitation is a fundamental component of the management of acutely and critically ill patients and the choice of fluid is a longstanding issue of debate.
Worldwide, 0.9% saline has traditionally been the most widely used resuscitation fluid, however its use is increasingly challenged by emerging evidence that suggests its high chloride content may have clinically important adverse effects and that resuscitation with so-called "balanced" or "buffered" crystalloids (such as Plasma-Lyte 148®) offer patients better outcomes.
Given the limitations of current evidence, there is now a s...
Gender
ALL
Eligibility criteria
- Inclusion Criteria:
- • The patient will receive fluid resuscitation defined as a bolus of fluid, prescribed to be administered over one hour or less to increase or maintain intravascular volume that is in addition to maintenance fluids, or specific fluids used to replace non-physiological fluid losses
- • The patient is expected to be in the ICU the day after tomorrow
- • The patient is not expected to be well enough to be eating tomorrow
- • An arterial or central venous catheter is in situ, or placement is imminent as part of routine management
- • Both Plasma-Lyte 148® and 0.9% saline are considered equally appropriate for the patient
- • The requirement for fluid resuscitation is supported by at least one of seven pre-specified clinical signs: heart rate \> 90 beats per minute; systolic blood pressure \< 100 mmHg or mean arterial pressure \< 75 mmHg; central venous pressure \< 10 mmHg; pulmonary artery wedge pressure \< 12 mmHg; capillary refill time \> 1 second; OR urine output \< 0.5 ml/kg for at least one hour
- Exclusion Criteria:
- • Age less than 18 years
- • Patients who have received more than 500mls of fluid resuscitation (as defined above) prescribed in the ICU during this current ICU admission
- • Patients transferred directly from another ICU who have received more than 500mls of fluid resuscitation (as defined above) during that ICU admission
- • Contraindication to either study fluid e.g. previous allergic reaction to Plasma-Lyte 148®
- • Patients admitted to the ICU with specific fluid requirements: the treatment of burns; following liver transplantation surgery; for correction of specific electrolyte abnormalities
- • Patients with traumatic brain injury or those considered at risk of developing cerebral oedema
- • Patients in whom death is deemed imminent and inevitable
- • Patients with an underlying disease process with a life expectancy of \<90 days
- • Patients in whom it is unlikely the primary outcome can be ascertained
- • Patients who have previously been enrolled in PLUS
- • Known or suspected pregnancy
Trial Officials
Simon Finfer, Professor
Study Chair
The George Institute
About The George Institute
The George Institute for Global Health is a leading research organization dedicated to improving health outcomes through innovative clinical trials and groundbreaking research. Based in Australia, the institute focuses on addressing major health challenges, particularly in the areas of chronic diseases, cardiovascular health, and health equity. With a commitment to translating scientific discoveries into real-world applications, The George Institute collaborates with global partners to advance knowledge and implement effective health interventions. Its multidisciplinary team of researchers employs rigorous methodologies to ensure high-quality evidence that informs policy and practice, ultimately striving to enhance public health on a global scale.
Contacts
Jennifer Cobb
Immunology at National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Locations
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Concord, New South Wales, Australia
Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
Frankston, Victoria, Australia
Launceston, Tasmania, Australia
Herston, Queensland, Australia
Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
Ringwood East, Victoria, Australia
Gosford, New South Wales, Australia
Auchenflower, Queensland, Australia
Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
Blacktown, New South Wales, Australia
Waratah, New South Wales, Australia
St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
Hamilton, , New Zealand
Tauranga, , New Zealand
Redcliffe, Queensland, Australia
Auckland, , New Zealand
Newtown, Wellington, New Zealand
Southport, Queensland, Australia
Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
Auckland, , New Zealand
Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
Hornsby, New South Wales, Australia
Dandenong, Victoria, Australia
Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
Nelson, , New Zealand
Southport, , Australia
Caringbah, New South Wales, Australia
Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia
Wahroonga, New South Wales, Australia
Robina, Queensland, Australia
South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Footscray, Victoria, Australia
St Albans, Victoria, Australia
Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
Takapuna, Auckland, New Zealand
Rotorua, Bay Of Plenty, New Zealand
Hastings, Camberley, New Zealand
Lower Hutt, Wellington, New Zealand
Auckland, , New Zealand
Patients applied
Timeline
First submit
Trial launched
Trial updated
Estimated completion
Not reported
Similar Trials