Comparing Machine Guided VR Based Training With Educator Guided Training in Metaverse

Launched by ACIBADEM UNIVERSITY · Feb 28, 2024

Keywords

ClinConnect Summary

This clinical trial is looking to find out which method of training is more effective for learning advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) skills: training using virtual reality (VR) guided by a machine or training led by a human educator in a virtual environment called the metaverse. Essentially, it's about comparing two different ways to teach lifesaving skills to see which one helps people learn better.

If you're interested in participating, you need to be someone who wants to volunteer for this study and is open to learning in a new way. However, you won’t be eligible if you've had any serious issues with virtual reality in the past, like motion sickness, or if you’ve previously trained in ACLS. You also shouldn't have certain medical conditions, like frequent vertigo, or be taking medications that could make you feel dizzy. If you join, you can expect to engage in an innovative learning experience that could help improve how ACLS is taught in the future.

Gender

ALL

Eligibility criteria

• Inclusion Criteria:
• • Volunteering for the study
• Exclusion Criteria:
• • Previously experienced VR-induced motion sickness
• • Previous Advanced Life Support training
• • Other medical conditions like vertigo attacks
• • Being under medication, which may cause vertigo like symptoms.