Comparing Outcomes of Non-surgical Versus Surgical Treatment of Shoulder Fractures With Different Shoulder Replacements

Launched by UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK · May 30, 2024

Keywords

ClinConnect Summary

This clinical trial is studying the best ways to treat complex shoulder fractures, specifically looking at two different approaches: non-surgical treatment and surgical treatment using different types of shoulder implants. The goal is to see which method leads to better recovery outcomes for patients with certain types of fractures in the upper arm bone near the shoulder. While older patients often receive non-surgical treatment, many do not have satisfactory results, so the researchers want to explore whether surgical options, particularly reverse shoulder arthroplasty, can provide better results.

To be eligible for this trial, participants should have a specific type of shoulder fracture known as a displaced proximal humeral fracture. This means the bone is broken in a way that has shifted its position. Patients who have other types of fractures, certain complications, or who are not able to comply with the study rules may not be included. Those who participate can expect to be part of a comparison between the two treatment methods and the different implant designs. It's important to note that this trial is currently not recruiting new participants, meaning they are not looking for new volunteers at this time.

Gender

ALL

Eligibility criteria

• Inclusion Criteria:
• • Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures (PHF) Neer type III or IV / AO B\&C. Radiological confirmed
• Exclusion Criteria:
• • other types of PHF, Head splits, gleno-humeral dislocations, pathological fractures. Refuse to participate in the study. Non-compliant, drug/alcohol abuse or institutionalized, (Low-cooperative),