Efficacy of Education Versus Education Plus Prescribed Fluid Intake on Hydration Status in High School Athletes

Launched by PEPSICO GLOBAL R&D · Oct 18, 2024

Keywords

ClinConnect Summary

This clinical trial is studying how effective education about hydration is compared to a more hands-on approach that includes specific instructions on how much fluid to drink for high school athletes. Researchers found that many athletes arrive at practice not fully hydrated, which could affect their performance and health. The goal of the study is to see if giving athletes set fluid intake goals helps them stay better hydrated than just educating them about the importance of drinking fluids.

To participate in this study, athletes must be between 13 and 19 years old, currently enrolled in the IMG sports program, and able to understand the study in English. They should not be smokers or have any health issues that could affect their ability to participate in sports. Participants can expect to learn more about hydration and receive guidance on fluid intake during their training. This study aims to help improve hydration practices in young athletes, which is crucial for their health and performance in sports.

Gender

ALL

Eligibility criteria

• Inclusion Criteria:
• • 1. Females and males between the ages of 13-19 years old
• • 2. Non-smoker
• • 3. Currently enrolled in the IMG sports program
• • 4. Able to give verbal and written informed consent for participation as well as obtain parental consent if \<18 years of age
• • 5. Must be fluent in English reading, writing, and speaking
• • 6. Parental permission
• Exclusion Criteria:
• • 1. Expulsion from school for any reason
• • 2. Leaving the IMG sports program
• • 3. Pregnant or planning to become pregnant
• • 4. Illness or injury that impacts sport participation or fluid balance
• • 5. Taking any medication that impacts fluid balance
• • 6. Participation in a clinical trial within past 30 days
• • 7. Participation in any PepsiCo trial within past 6 months
• • 8. Any condition the study investigator believes would interfere with eligibility following the study protocol, effect the study results, or put the subject at undue risk