ClinConnect ClinConnect Logo
Dark Mode
Log in

How will co-designed consent, chemo comfort & remote BP cut dropouts?

How will co-designed consent, chemo comfort & remote BP cut dropouts?
When Marta received the invitation to a stroke trial, she hesitated—not because she feared the treatment, but because the consent form felt like a contract written in a different language. Months later she returned as an advisor to rewrite that same form. Her experience seeded a change that cut confusion, shortened enrollment visits, and kept people like her in the study longer.

What to expect during a clinical trial

A typical day can include check-in, vitals, study procedures, and time with the research nurse. Expect clear explanations about risks and benefits, time to ask questions, and often follow-up calls. Many patients find clinical trials through dedicated platforms that match their condition with relevant studies, which makes discovering and preparing for visits easier.

Co-designed consent for stroke trials

A small neurology team piloted a patient-centered informed consent co-design for stroke trials by inviting survivors to workshops. The revised consent used plain language, icons, and a short video. In a survey of 142 clinical professionals, 68% said co-designed consent reduced enrollment questions and 54% reported fewer early withdrawals in the first month. One biotech founder who helped build the consent tool said, "When patients help write the story, they stay in the study to see how it ends."

Chemo comfort and chair-time in breast oncology

At an oncology center, a comfort bundle—adjustable recliners, warm blankets, guided audio for anxiety, and faster IV pump setups—was introduced as part of reducing chemo chair-time comfort strategies for breast oncology. A brief case study of 60 participants showed average chair-time dropped by 12 minutes and same-day attrition fell by 9%. Clinical staff reported in the same survey that 74% believed comfort interventions directly improved adherence.

Remote BP monitoring to keep people in hypertension trials

In a hypertension trial, remote blood-pressure monitoring to boost hypertension retention meant patients used a home cuff linked to an app. Retention climbed from 72% to 88% at six months in a pilot cohort; clinicians flagged fewer missed visits and faster dose adjustments. A startup founder who built the cloud dashboard said the human story matters: patients felt their care continued between visits, not just during them.

Measuring vision in diabetic macular edema participants

Visual function endpoints for diabetic macular edema participants now include home-based reading and contrast tests alongside clinic acuity measures. One participant reported that weekly home checks made subtle changes visible sooner, and the study team could triage faster. Clinical professionals in the survey noted 62% saw home visual endpoints as a retention-friendly innovation.
"Design with people, not for them," said a research coordinator who led the co-design workshops.
  • Story-driven consent reduces anxiety and shortens first visits
  • Comfort protocols lower same-day chemo dropouts
  • Remote monitoring keeps hypertension participants engaged
  • Home visual tests catch changes and keep DME participants connected

Actionable next steps

  1. Invite former participants to a one-time co-design workshop for consent materials.
  2. Pilot a comfort bundle for chemo chair time and measure chair-time and same-day attrition.
  3. Implement remote blood-pressure monitoring for follow-up windows and track retention metrics.
  4. Add a validated home visual function test for diabetic macular edema arms and train patients on use.
  5. Use trial discovery platforms to recruit diverse participants and streamline scheduling.
Stories like Marta's show how small, human-focused changes—co-design, comfort, remote monitoring, and meaningful endpoints—translate into fewer dropouts and richer data. Platforms like ClinConnect are making it easier for patients to find trials that match their specific needs, and when founders, clinicians, and patients collaborate, the result is research that people want to finish.

Related Articles

x- x- x-