Dynamic Stabilization Versus Fusion

Launched by TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH · Jun 2, 2011

Keywords

ClinConnect Summary

Two strategies for treatment of degenerative lumbar instability are in frequent clinical use: fusion versus dynamic stabilization. Up to now it is not clear whether fusion (Gold-standard) or the non-fusion technique is superior. Nevertheless some data are available that dynamic stabilization as a less invasive technique can achieve similar or better results concerning patient satisfaction and re-OP rate compared with fusion as the standard therapy.

Gender

ALL

Eligibility criteria

• Inclusion Criteria:
• • Age \>18 years
• • Mono- or bisegmental symptomatic lumbar degenerative disease with or without stenosis
• • Indication for fusion with (i) spondylolisthesis of at least 5mm or segmental vertebral motion of at least 3mm or 10º on flexion/extension radiographs, (ii) predominant low back pain in combination with Modic changes
• • Failure of adequate conservative measures for more than 3 months
• • Correctly signed informed consent form
• Exclusion Criteria:
• • Olisthesis more than grade I, spondylolisthesis vera, spondylolysis without olisthesis or spinal deformity (i.e. scoliosis of more than 20°, sagittal imbalance)
• • Significant comorbidity impeding with surgical success (e.g. osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, mental illness)
• • Previous fusion or stabilization surgery