Marginal Adaptation, Shade Matching, of Polychromatic Feldspathic VS Polychromatic Hybrid Ceramic Laminate Veneer

Launched by CAIRO UNIVERSITY · Jun 22, 2021

Keywords

ClinConnect Summary

PICO P: Population: patients' needs esthetic anterior veneers. I: Intervention: Multicolor hybrid ceramic laminate veneers. C: Comparison: Multicolor feldspathic laminate veneers. O: Outcome: primary: Marginal adaptation. secondary:1 Shade matching 2. Patient satisfaction. S: Study design: Randomized controlled clinical trial. T Time: One year. Research question Will polychromatic hybrid ceramic laminate veneer improve the marginal adaptation, shade matching, and patient satisfaction when compared to polychromatic feldspathic porcelain laminate veneer? Statement of the problem Anterior all-...

Gender

ALL

Eligibility criteria

• Inclusion Criteria: All subjects are required to be:
• • 1. patients age range (18-50 years) old, be able to read and sign the informed consent document.
• • 2. Have no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, have teeth with good restorations
• • 3. Psychologically and physically able to withstand conventional dental procedures
• • 4. Patients in a need of anterior veneers.
• • 5. Able to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation
• Exclusion Criteria:
• • 1. Patient less than 18 or more than 50 years
• • 2. Patient with active persistent periodontal diseases
• • 3. Patients with poor oral hygiene and uncooperative patients
• • 4. Patients need a smile design for the esthetic zone.
• • 5. Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth
• • 6. Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations
• • 7. patient with non-vital teeth.